CFD simulation of the unsteady flow of a single coal log in a pipe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study proposes a numerical simulation of the unsteady turbulent flow of a single coal log in a pipe using a dynamic mesh method. An eccentric two‐dimensional dynamic model is developed in FLUENT 6.2. The model contains a straight section and a bent section. Comparisons of the coal log velocity and the pressure distributions of the pipe and the coal log surface are made between the calculated results and the experimental data. The shear force and the friction coefficient are also calculated to verify changes of the influence of water on the coal log. The results of this simulation display the dynamic motion of the coal log for startup and turning. Water drag force moves the coal log, making the coal log velocity greater than the water velocity. The lifting force lifts the coal log and moves its tail slightly upward. The pressure drop of the whole pipe is respectively larger in the presence of the coal log. The pressure along the coal log surface slowly declines. The appearance of a bend impedes the motion of the coal log and enhances abrasion. The coal log has difficulty being suspended due to decreased lifting force and increased friction. The pressure on the coal log surface rises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".