Bibliographic record
Abstract
La créolisation est le fruit des situations d’acculturation qui caractérisent certaines sociétés formées avec la colonisation, donnant naissance à des configurations socioanthropologiques singulières, tant sur le plan des productions matérielles et immatérielles que sur celui des formes de vivre-ensemble. Dans ces processus, l’alimentation joue un rôle majeur en tant que support de construction et d’expression identitaires. Sur le plan sociohistorique, la créolisation de l’alimentation correspond aux formes d’entrecroisements culturels intervenus dans ces sociétés, donnant ce que l’on appelle localement les cuisines créoles ; ces hybridations se poursuivent aujourd’hui encore avec la globalisation et les migrations plus récentes. Plus largement, elle désigne les processus identitaires qui entourent l’alimentation et par lesquels les populations en situation de diversité culturelle marquent l’en-commun et la différence. La réflexion s’appuie sur l’étude du système alimentaire à La Réunion, où la cuisine créole et le manger créole symbolisent l’appartenance commune, alors que les autres cuisines soutiennent les dynamiques de différenciation et de construction de la mémoire des origines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.153 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".