MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1892951648

Caribbean Energy Sector: Review and Perspectives - Part II - Electricity

2012· article· en· W1892951648 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trevor M. Boopsingh, Trevor A. Byer, Gerald Richards, Chandrabhan Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueCaribbean dialogue · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeveloping countryCommodityElectricityBusinessEconomicsEconomic growthMains electricityAppropriate technologyFinanceEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical energy requirement for any country in the next century be it developed, developing or underdeveloped, is that of Electricity. The indispensable nature of electricity to the use of the information technologies, whether its use is in entertainment, marketing, communication, raw data transmission or as a method for effecting cultural or education changes in the lifestyles of the many and very diverse peoples of the world is already evident, six years prior to the next century. Some perspectives on the global technology trends in the provision of this critical commodity is therefore critical, if practical, viable and realistic proposals for meeting the energy needs of the Caribbean are to be had. The supply of electrical energy in economic and affordable terms to meet basic needs and facilitate economic growth in the developing countries is a major challenge to the global energy community. In particular, it requires the mobilization of appropriate local and global finance and the relevant transfer of technology to the developing nations on one hand, and the establishment of stable institutional arrangements and appropriate economic policies and measures by these nations to attract such technology and financing, on the other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaribbean dialogueSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207