MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893043363

Control of mixing process in a novel micro-mixer

2012· article· en· W1893043363 on OpenAlexaff
Behzad Otrodi, Mohammad Eghtesad, Mojatba Mahzoon, Saeid Movahed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Control, Automation and Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixing (physics)Zeta potentialMechanicsRange (aeronautics)Materials scienceProcess (computing)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceNanotechnologyPhysicsComposite materialControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are many different types of micro-mixers which have been designed to enhance mixing efficiency of fluid flow in micro-channels. The output of micro-channels integrated with micro-mixers in some cases may need to be in a certain range. In this article we design a new type of micro-mixer by utilizing conductive surfaces and walls with variable zeta potential. Interaction of the induced charged electro-kinetic (ICEK) phenomenon (due to existence of conductive surfaces) and producing diverse electro-osmotic boundary velocity (because of presence of walls with changeable zeta potential) together lead to increase mixing efficiency of the system significantly. Numerical simulation are performed to analyze the system and the results show that by using this micro-mixer with different zeta potential applied to walls, we can have a wide range of mixing efficiency between 30% and 85%. Moreover, we applied a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) to the system to manage the percentage of mixing efficiency within this range. This controller based on desired mixing efficiency; determine the amount of zeta potential on each wall and thus we can reach the amount of required mixing efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Control, Automation and SystemsSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207