MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893066467 · doi:10.1037/cep0000061

CSBBCS at Ryerson University and the embodied cognition debate.

2015· editorial· en· W1893066467 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen J. Lupker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionCognitionPsychologyCognitive scienceCognitive roboticsFocus (optics)Motor cognitionCognitive psychologySocial cognitionEpistemologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduces a series of articles in the current issue of the Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology that focuses on embodied cognition. Embodied cognition is the role of sensorimotor processes in cognition. In organizing the Past-President's Symposium at the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science's annual meeting, the outgoing past-president chose embodied cognition as the focus, and invited a proponent of the embodied position as well as one of the abstract position to present their views. The material from the symposium was used to create this series of articles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentaleSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207