MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893176357 · doi:10.1002/mabi.201300425

A Thermoreversible Poly(Choline Phosphate) Based Universal Biomembrane Adhesive

2013· article· en· W1893176357 on OpenAlexafffund
Xifei Yu, Xiaoqiang Yang, Sonja Horte, Jayachandran N. Kizhakkedathu, Donald E. Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Bioscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLower critical solution temperatureMethacrylatePolymer chemistryAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationPolymerChemistryPolymerizationMonomerMembraneAlkoxy groupChemical engineeringCopolymerOrganic chemistryAlkylBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new monomer, 2-(2-(2-(2-azidoethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl methacrylate (AEO4 MA), and its direct atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) into poly(AEO4 MA), then "clicked" with prop-2-ynyle choline phosphate (CP) to produce a poly(choline phosphate) are described. This polymer exhibits a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) at ≈ 32 °C, and provides a universal thermally reversible biomembrane adhesive, which can rapidly both bind to any mammalian cell membrane and internalize into the cytoplasm of nucleated cells below the LCST. Moving above the LCST reverses cell surface binding. The use of ATRP implies that such polymers can be applied to modify the surfaces of a wide range of biomaterials. The capacity to bind and immobilize cells at room temperature and release them above the LCST should be particularly useful for in vitro cell manipulation and tissue engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular BioscienceSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207