MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893198581 · doi:10.1063/1.4934805

Maximum wind turbine performance at low tip speed ratio

2015· article· en· W1893198581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTip-speed ratioTurbineRotor (electric)TorqueControl theory (sociology)MechanicsMaximum power principlePower (physics)RADIUSLimit (mathematics)Rotational speedMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind turbines can approach the Betz-Joukowsky limit on maximum power only at sufficiently high tip speed ratio: in practice, for ratios in excess of about seven. This paper analyses the performance of a turbine with an infinite number of blades as the tip speed ratio decreases to zero, beginning with the two traditional ways of determining the maximum power. The first is the “Glauert” optimization of the power extracted at every radius and the second is the “Betz-Goldstein” optimization of the whole rotor with the wake represented as a rigid helicoidal sheet of constant pitch. At high tip speed ratio, the two methods give very similar power and both asymptote to the Betz-Joukowsky limit. As the ratio approaches zero, the differences become significant. It is shown that Glauert's analysis does not account for effect of the varying pitch on the axial velocity. In addition, there is a large and unphysical energy extraction by a stationary rotor, and an unphysical constant circumferential velocity. Glauert's analysis, however, gives positive torque on a stationary rotor, which is necessary to start a wind turbine, but the torque at very low tip speed ratio seems too high. In contrast, the Betz-Goldstein analysis implies no torque on a stationary rotor but the circumferential velocity is zero on the axis of rotation. A modification is proposed to the Betz-Goldstein analysis to yield positive torque on a stationary rotor. The modified Betz-Goldstein torque coefficient never exceeds 1/2 and the power is less than the Glauert optimum. Finally, the analysis for varying pitch is corrected and the power maximized numerically. The modification applied to the Betz-Goldstein rotor is required to produce torque on the stationary rotor. The maximum torque coefficient was 0.55, and the maximum power was again less than the Glauert maximum. As tip speed ratio increases, the power from all methods asymptotes to the Betz-Joukowsky limit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it