Rendimento mínimo garantido. Uma experiência de trabalho em parceria na CLA de Odivelas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto retracta uma experiencia de trabalho em parceria no âmbito do RMG. O grande numero de beneficiarios dessa Medida e a existencia de problematicas de dificil intervencao levou o Nucleo Executivo da Comissao Local de Acompanhamento de Odivelas a constituir grupos de trabalho e de reflexao por problematicas especificas. Do grupo dos individuos e/ou familias com problematica de alcoolismo nasceu a ideia de trabalho por Projecto designado Viver de Novo. Procurou-se a articulacao com servicos da especialidade e nasceu a ideia de equipa comunitaria . Com o objectivo de conhecer para melhor intervir foi elaborado um estudo de investigacao que procurou caracterizar os beneficiarios de RMG com problematica de alcoolismo, no Concelho de Odivelas, entre Fevereiro/ 97 e Abril/2000. As conclusoes dai resultantes e aqui apresentadas constituem um ponto de partida para o amadurecimento dessa mesma experiencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".