MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893403406 · doi:10.1111/ijs.12509

Global Survey of the Diagnostic Evaluation and Management of Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke

2015· article· en· W1893403406 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Stroke · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersBayer HealthCare
KeywordsMedicineAntithromboticStroke (engine)Emergency medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: About 25% of ischemic strokes are categorized as cryptogenic (i.e. of unknown cause), but few data exist about the extent of diagnostic testing or treatment. We undertook an international survey to characterize current diagnostic evaluation and antithrombotic management of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke in 2014. AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the type of diagnostic evaluation undertaken for cryptogenic ischemic stroke and antithrombotic management and to compare across global regions. METHODS: An 18-question online survey was sent to 995 physicians involved in stroke care in 61 countries. Countries were separated into World Bank global regions and income groups. Diagnostic tests were considered routine if performed in >75% of patients at a center. RESULTS: Three hundred one completed surveys were received from 48 countries (response rate ∼30%). The majority (82%) of hospitals were from high-income countries and mainly from Europe and Central Asia (56%) and North America (19%). For ischemic stroke patients, magnetic resonance imaging is routinely obtained at 36% of hospitals (highest in North America, 58%). Among cryptogenic stroke patients, transesophageal echocardiography is routinely performed in 17% of hospitals. More than 24 hour cardiac rhythm monitoring is done routinely at relatively few (17%) hospitals (highest in North America, 33%). Intracranial arterial imaging is done routinely at 70% of hospitals, with no significant regional differences. Antiplatelet therapies are routinely prescribed for secondary prevention at 94% of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Based on self-selected respondents from a large number of international stroke centers, transesophageal echocardiography and prolonged (>24 h) cardiac rhythm monitoring are not routinely performed in cryptogenic stroke patients, even in high-income countries. Antiplatelet therapy is the global standard for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it