MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893457627 · doi:10.4000/books.igpde.2438

Les relations entre le Royaume-Uni et la Communauté européenne dans le domaine de l’aide au développement entre 1975 et 2000 : influence mutuelle ou dialogue de sourds ?

2013· book-chapter· fr· W1893457627 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon D. Cumming

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionRapidement après son entrée dans la Communauté économique européenne (CEE) en 1973, le Royaume-Uni en est venu à être perçu par certains États membres comme un « partenaire difficile ». Les Britanniques ne se sentaient pas entendus sur des questions telles que le rabais budgétaire accordé en leur faveur ou encore la politique agricole commune (PAC) et en étaient particulièrement outrés. Ils se plaignaient également, quoique de manière moins véhémente, de leur manque d’ascendant s...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooksSame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207