MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893862697 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1999.832717

Experimental results on neural network-based control strategies for flexible-link manipulators

2003· article· en· W1893862697 on OpenAlexaff
Heidar Ali Talebi, K. Khorasani, Rajni V. Patel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemController (irrigation)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriNonlinear controlIdentifierControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of controlling a nonminimum phase nonlinear system with application to tip position control of a flexible-link manipulator is considered. An output re-definition strategy is developed which is applicable to a class of open-loop stable nonlinear systems whose input-output maps contain nonlinear terms from output and linear terms from input. No a priori knowledge about the nonlinearities of the system is required. The output re-definition scheme is based on first identifying the nonlinearities of the system using neural networks and then modifying the system zero dynamics. A stable/anti-stable factorization is performed on the zero dynamics of the system. The new output is re-defined using the neural identifier and the stable part of the zero dynamics. A controller is then designed based on the new output whose zero dynamics are stable and can be inverted. For the flexible-link manipulator case, the controller is composed of a stabilizing joint PD controller and an output re-definition tracking controller. Experimental and simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme as compared to both linear and nonlinear conventional controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207