MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1894102777 · doi:10.1139/p99-019

Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of Tm<sup>3+</sup>-doped KY<sub>3</sub>F<sub>10</sub> single crystals

2000· article· en· W1894102777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Diaf, Alain Braud, Christophe Labbé, Jean‐Louis Doualan, Sylvain Girard, J. Margerie, R. Moncorgé, M. Thuau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolid State Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsLaserEmission spectrumLuminescenceRadiative transferAbsorption spectroscopyThuliumSpectral lineDopingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)IonOpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the laser possibilities offered by Tm3+-doped KY3F10. After crystal growth and X-ray diffraction analysis, the optical properties of thulium ions in KY3F10 are determined for the first time. Absorption and emission spectra recorded at low temperatures are used to obtain a set of Stark sublevels, whereas the room-temperature absorption spectra have been allowed to fit the three phenomenological Judd-Ofelt (JO) parameters. The emission line strengths, branching ratios, and radiative lifetimes of levels from 3F4 up to 1D2 are then deduced. A comparison between the calculated lifetimes and the measured luminescence decay curves permits us to check the reliability of the JO analysis for this system. The potential of Tm:KY3F10 for laser emission from 3H4 or 3F4 emitting levels is briefly examined.PACS Nos.: 42.55.Rz, 78.50.Ec, 78.47.+p, 81.10.Fq.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSolid State Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207