Treatment Resistant Symptoms of Complex PTSD Caused by Torture During War
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the severity and complexity of a treatment resistant PTSD caused by torture during war. The inclusive criteria included the experience of torture and no efficacy of provided therapy after five years of being treated due to severe war-related PTSD. Method: The study was conducted on 24 treatment resistant PTSD patients from former Yugoslavia who had been tortured during their captivity as the POW. Despite being already diagnosed and treated due to their war-related PTSD, all patients were screened by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), MMPI, and the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS). Results: Results of the initial assessment revealed that 19 out of 24 patients satisfied criteria for treatment resistant symptoms of complex PTSD due to severe trauma experience. Conclusion: The treatment resistant PTSD is very a complex condition that requires various ways to make real contact with, endeavour congruent, emphatic and unconditional positive regards for the patients. It is important that clinicians do not use a ‘copping’ but qualitative and idiographic individual approach to each patient finding differences value alongside.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".