Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yaşadıkları Problemler ve Psikolojik Yardım Arama Gönüllükleri
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the relationships between Turkish university students’ problem areas, problem levels and their preferences and willingness for help. The sample of the study included 5829 undergraduate students (2974 females, 2841 males, 14 unknown). In order to collect the data, Problem Concern Scale, Psychological Help Seeking Willingness Scale and Information Sheet were used. To examine the differences in students’ scores, t-test, one way analyses variance, and Bonferroni Multiple Comparison Test were administered. The results of analyses showed that there were significant differences between female and male students in problem areas and psychological help seeking willingness. Students from higher socio-economic status have more problems than others. Turkish university students experienced mostly emotional, academic and economic problems. Also, students were more willing to seek help from their family and friends. In general, students’willingness to seek help from professionals was at moderate level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it