MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of micronisation and electromagnetic radiation on physical and mechanical properties of Canadian barley

2011· article· en· W1894367523 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shahram Emami, Venkatesh Meda, Robert T. Tyler

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMinistry of Agriculture - SaskatchewanUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMicrowaveMaterials scienceBreakageMoistureWater contentRadiationRadiant intensityComposite materialInfraredThermal diffusivityOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The effect of micronisation (high‐intensity infrared heating) and microwave radiation of normal barley (NB), high‐amylose barley (HAB) and waxy barley (WB) on the physical and mechanical properties was studied. Samples were tempered to 42–45% moisture content and then subjected to infrared or microwave radiation to reduce the moisture content to approximately 10%. The grain surface temperature during radiation was maintained at 100 °C. The changes in physical and mechanical properties were compared with unprocessed samples. Thermal radiation increased slightly the volume of the kernels because of the diffusion of water vapour from inside to the outer surface. These changes resulted in a decrease in particle and bulk densities. Thermal radiation affected the Hunter colour values, as well. The mechanical properties including bio‐yield point, modulus of elasticity and breakage susceptibility were affected by micronisation and microwave heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food Science & TechnologySame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207