Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population Ageing is the main feature of humankind development in the 21st century. It has become the hot problem concerned by the world’s governments and societies. This paper summarizes the basic present situation, the developmental trends and the basic features of population ageing in China. It also analyzes the responsibilities of national system, community construction and family providing for the aged and professional social workers in ageing trends. It intends to make suggestions about our social ageing trends. Key words: Ageing, Present situation, Strategy Resume: Le vieillissement de la populaton, caracteristique principale du developpement de l’humanite au 21e sicecle, constitue le point chaud auquel tous les gouvernements et toutes les societes accordent beaucoup d’attention. Cet article, en faisant le bilan du statu quo, de la tendance de developpement et des caracteristiques du vieillissement de la population chinoise, analyse les responsabilites du regime d’Etat, de la construction du quartier, de l’entretien de la vie des parents dans la famille ainsi que des benevoles professionnels dans la tendance de vieillissement, et ainsi etudie les contre-mesures. Mots-Cles: vieillissement, statu quo, contre-mesure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".