MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1894505694 · doi:10.7202/1031002ar

Le bilinguisme dans les répertoires dramatiques franco-canadiens de l’Ouest : perspectives identitaires et esthétiques

2015· article· fr· W1894505694 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Louise Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le bilinguisme des Franco-Canadiens a donné lieu à de multiples représentations théâtrales qui témoignent du changement d’attitude à son égard au fil du temps. D’abord perçu comme agent d’assimilation néfaste au français et banni des scènes francophones, ce bilinguisme s’est manifesté timidement dans les pièces par l’alternance de codes dans les dialogues en langue populaire. Par la suite, l’affirmation nationaliste québécoise et la mondialisation des marchés ont contribué à lui donner une valeur accrue. Les auteurs dramatiques de l’Ouest canadien entreprennent alors de le mettre au service de la création dans des productions qui exploitent sans discrimination toutes leurs ressources linguistiques. Ces écritures proposent des nouveautés esthétiques nourries par un imaginaire translingue qui repousse les limites de la loyauté linguistique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207