Le bilinguisme dans les répertoires dramatiques franco-canadiens de l’Ouest : perspectives identitaires et esthétiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le bilinguisme des Franco-Canadiens a donné lieu à de multiples représentations théâtrales qui témoignent du changement d’attitude à son égard au fil du temps. D’abord perçu comme agent d’assimilation néfaste au français et banni des scènes francophones, ce bilinguisme s’est manifesté timidement dans les pièces par l’alternance de codes dans les dialogues en langue populaire. Par la suite, l’affirmation nationaliste québécoise et la mondialisation des marchés ont contribué à lui donner une valeur accrue. Les auteurs dramatiques de l’Ouest canadien entreprennent alors de le mettre au service de la création dans des productions qui exploitent sans discrimination toutes leurs ressources linguistiques. Ces écritures proposent des nouveautés esthétiques nourries par un imaginaire translingue qui repousse les limites de la loyauté linguistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".