La transmission d'entreprise au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les études sur la transmission d’entreprise mettent souvent l’accent sur la planification de la relève et donnent la parole aux entrepreneurs. Nous avons plutôt choisi de nous attarder au transfert de propriété et de donner la parole aux financiers pour obtenir leur vision du processus de transmission d’entreprise, connaître leurs stratégies d’intervention et les produits disponibles. Cet article présente le point de vue de quatre institutions, soit la Banque de développement du Canada, la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, Desjardins Capital de risque et le Fonds de solidarité FTQ, lesquelles participent depuis plusieurs années au financement de la transmission d’entreprise, que la relève soit familiale ou non. Les interventions de ces institutions permettent également de poser des jalons qui aident les entrepreneurs à cheminer dans leur démarche de transmission d’entreprise. Elles ont à cœur la réussite de cette démarche puisque leurs intérêts, c’est-à-dire la croissance, la rentabilité et la pérennité de l’entreprise, convergent avec ceux des dirigeants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".