Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spirit of Daqing forming in 1960s, it is the product of development and construction of Daqing oil field under Marx doctrine’s world outlook and methodology, besides it is also an important component of our national spirit. It regards “Patriotism, Entrepreneurship, Realism, Dedication” as its soul. In the moment that Daqing strives to become an international city, it is necessary for the spirit of Daqing gonging out of our country with highly cultural self-consciousness and confidence; it is recognized and accepted by global people of all ethnic groups. This is not only the needs of carrying forward our national spirit, promoting Chinese national soft power of courage but also the due meaning in the topic of the socialist core value system. The specific conception follows: To study the spirit of Daqing thoroughly, grasp the kernel of the soul of the spirit of Daqing, to seek the meeting point with other national spirit, to explore its shared value for human beings; to create, translate and output some materials that reflects Daqing culture using various language forms from the intellectual, cultural and artistic aspects; to cultivate and enhance the sense of responsibility and mission of Daqing oil workers who have worked overseas let them spread the connotation of the spirit of Daqing to foreign countries in which they are living now with their practical actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".