Análisis dimensional de la cobertura vegetal-uso de suelo en la Cuenca del Río Magdalena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN El Distrito Federal alberga a una de las ciudades con mayor densidad depoblacion en el mundo; sin embargo, 58% de su territorio es considerado como suelo de conservacion. El presente estudio se desarrollo en la canada de laMagdalena Contreras al sur de la entidad, donde se realizo un analisis de la dimensionespacial por tipo de cobertura vegetal y uso del suelo; mediante el cruce deinformacion geografica se genero una matriz de las variables ambientales, quepermitio hacer un analisis preciso de los componentes principales, al conocer la superficie y ubicacion de cada una de las coberturas vegetales en funcion de la temperatura, precipitacion, altitud, edafologia y orientacion respecto al sol. Se identificaron 20 clases, con una dominancia de Abies religiosa , que cubre 0%, del cual, % corresponde a bosque cerrado y 6% a bosque abierto. La segundacobertura mas frecuente es la de Pinus hartwegii con 20%, que comprende 10.8% de su territorio con dosel abierto y 9.68% cerrado. La tercera categoria es elecotono de bosque de
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".