MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1895472003 · doi:10.1063/1.4932296

Direct reaction experimental studies with beams of radioactive tin ions

2015· article· en· W1895472003 on OpenAlexaff
K. L. Jones, S. Ahn, J. M. Allmond, A. Ayres, D. W. Bardayan, T. Baugher, D. Bazin, J. R. Beene, J. S. Berryman, A. Bey, C. R. Bingham, S. Burcher, L. Cartegni, G. Cerizza, K. Y. Chae, J. A. Cizewski, A. Gade, A. Galindo-Uribarri, R.F. Garcia-Ruiz, R. Grzywacz, M. E. Howard, R. L. Kozub, J. F. Liang, B. Manning, M. Matoš, S. McDaniel, D. Miller, C. D. Nesaraja, P. D. O’Malley, S. Padgett, E. Padilla-Rodal, S. D. Pain, S. T. Pittman, D. C. Radford, A. Ratkiewicz, K. Schmitt, A. Shore, M. S. Smith, D. W. Stracener, S. R. Stroberg, J. A. Tostevin, R. L. Varner, D. Weißhaar, K. Wimmer, R. Winkler

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersCotton Research and Development Corporation
KeywordsIsotopes of tinTinNeutronIsotopeIonNuclear physicsParticle (ecology)Nuclear reactionCharged particleRadiochemistryPhysicsAtomic physicsMaterials scienceChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tin chain of isotopes provides a unique region in which to investigate the evolution of single-particle structure, spreading from N = 50 at Sn-100, through 10 stable isotopes and the N = 82 shell closure at Sn-132 out into the r-process path. Direct reactions performed on radioactive ion beams are sensitive spectroscopic tools for studying exotic nuclei. Here we present one experiment knocking out neutrons from tin isotopes that are already neutron deficient and two reactions that add a neutron to neutron-rich Sn-130. Both techniques rely on selective particle identification and the measurement of gamma rays in coincidence with charged ions. We present the goals of the two experiments and the particle identification for the channels of interest. The final results will be presented in future publications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207