Ammonia detoxification and localization of urea cycle enzyme activity in embryos of the rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) in relation to early tolerance to high environmental ammonia levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study investigated the role of ammonia as a trigger for hatching, mechanisms of ammonia detoxification and the localization of urea cycle enzymes in the early life stages of freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The key urea cycle enzyme carbamoyl phosphate synthetase III was found exclusively in the embryonic body (non-hepatic tissues); related enzymes were distributed between the liver and embryonic body. 'Eyed-up' trout embryos were exposed either acutely (2h) to 10 mmol l(-1) NH(4)Cl or chronically (4 days) to 0.2 mmol l(-1) NH(4)Cl. Time to hatching was not affected by either acute or chronic NH(4)Cl exposure. Urea levels, but not ammonia levels in the embryonic tissues, were significantly higher than in controls after both acute and chronic NH(4)Cl exposure, whereas there were no significant changes in urea cycle enzyme activities. Total amino acid levels in the embryonic tissues were unaltered by chronic ammonia exposure, but levels of most individual amino acids and total amino acid levels in the yolk were significantly lower (by 34-58%) than in non-exposed controls. The data indicate that trout embryos have an efficient system to prevent ammonia accumulation in embryonic tissue, by conversion of ammonia to urea in embryonic tissues and through elevation of ammonia levels in the yolk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".