MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1895837327

Caracterización molecular y biológica del virus de la Rabia que circula en zorrillos de México enfocado a la variante del gen de la fosfoproteína (P)

2012· article· es· W1895837327 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Loza‐Rubio, Susan A. Nadin‐Davis, Elizabeth Morales Salinas

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo de este estudio fue la caracterización molecular y biológica del virus de la rabia en zorrillos de México, comparando una porción de la secuencia viral del gen P, con regiones correspondientes de variantes de virus rábico adaptadas en zorrillos y pertenecientes al genotipo 1 (virus de la rabia ¿clásica¿), que circulan en América. Como parte de la caracterización biológica se incluyó el periodo de incubación y las lesiones histopatológicas después de la inoculación del virus por vía intracerebral en ratones. De acuerdo a los resultados de estudios filogenéticos, las cepas de zorrillo mexicano (variante antigénica (AV8 y AV10) son muy distintas en cuanto a su evolución. El aislado AV10 de Baja California Sur está muy relacionado con los virus que circulan en zorrillos de California; mientras que el aislado AV8 de San Luis Potosí tuvo mayor relación con la cepa del zorrillo del Centro/Sur que circula en los estados del sur, como Texas. Estas variantes se reflejaron en algunas propiedades biológicas de ambas cepas en ratones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207