MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896011700 · doi:10.20453/rmh.v3i3.376

Diabetes mellitus insulino dependiente en población de costa, sierra y selva del Perú

2013· article· es· W1896011700 on OpenAlexaff
Segundo Seclén, M.B. Esteban Rojas, Héctor H. Valdivia, Bernardo Millones, Olivier Núñez, Walter Zegarra, José Miguel Martínez Carrión, GRUPO EPIDEMIOLOGICO DE ESTUDIO DE LA DI

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Médica Herediana · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGeographyGynecologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente investigación describe la epidemiología de la diabetes mellitus insulinodependiente (Tipo I) en la población peruana, a través de 3 registros que tomaron como estudio al grupo etáreo menor de 15 años de la provincia de Lima, Cuzco y San Martín queen conjunto representan el 28% de la población peruana menor de 15 años. La fuente primaria de datos fueron los casos ocurridos en 25 hospitales entre 1980-1988, siendo los criterios de selección: haber sido diagnosticado de diabetes (OMS), haber tenido menos de 15 años de edad al diagnóstico, estar en insulino terapia y ser residente de su ciudad. El número de casos encontrados fueron 55, de los cuales 22 tuvieron menos de 15 años en 1988, con una prevalencia de 0.94/100,000 y una incidencia anual de 0.6/100.000. La fuente secundaria de datos fue la Asociación Peruana de Diabetes con 90% de validación de los casos registrados. La baja tasa de prevalencia e incidencia de diabetes mellitas insulina-dependientes (tipo-I) encontradas en la población peruana y comparadas con las de poblaciones caucásicas de Europa y USA, sugieren muy poca predisposición de nuestra raza mestiza para adquirir esta enfermedad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Médica HeredianaSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207