Un article que peut sauter quiconque n’a pas d’idée personnelle sur les pouvoirs sociaux du vêtement et du nu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En analysant la relation corporelle entre les personnages de Diotime et de Rachel, nous explorons dans le présent article l’intuition sociologique du romancier Robert Musil quant au pouvoir du vêtement, de la nudité et des dominations qui peuvent être véhiculées au travers des contacts corporels non-violents. À cet effet, nous croisons des extraits du roman expérimental L’Homme sans qualités et quelques commentaires de sociologues du vêtement et de la mode. Cette dernière, quoiqu’également traitée par Musil, n’est pas ce sur quoi nous concentrons nos efforts. En effet, c’est la relation Diotime-Rachel, celle qui dessine les voies d’une domination morale s’adossant sur un quadrillage corporel, et les modifications qu’elle connaîtra suite aux expériences érotiques respectives des personnages qui nous intéressent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".