MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896144412 · doi:10.15388/ekon.2010.0.980

ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN THE TURNOVER OF LITHUANIAN RETAIL TRADE ENTERPRISES IN 2001–2008

2010· article· en· W1896144412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petras Vytautas Vengrauskas, Vytautas Mackevičius

Bibliographic record

VenueEkonomika · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithuanianRetail tradeInventory turnoverQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessTurnoverTrade volumeExternal tradeInternational economicsEconomicsInternational tradeCommerceFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents an analysis of the methodological side of assessing the turnover of Lithuanian retail trade enterprises, i.e. the indicators to be employed in assessing changes in the volume and composition of the turnover over a longer term, their relationship with other national economic indicators, as well as their theoretical and practical significance. The analysis of changes in the volume and composition of the turnover of Lithuanian retail enterprises in 2000–2008 has revealed its positive and negative trends and the factors influencing these changes. The period under consideration is remarkable in that the years 2000–2001 marked the recovery of the Lithuanian economy after the financial crisis in Russia, its growth until the third quarter of 2008 and the beginning of its decline. The paper summarizes trends in and problems of changes in the volume and composition of the turnover of the country’s retail trade enterprises in the period under consideration and shows the possibilities for its development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEkonomikaSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207