Partnership practices in Wales : case studies of local rural partnership working
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two methods for determining mug/g and ng/g levels of the noble metals, except for osmium, in ores, concentrates, mattes, and silicate and iron-formation rocks are described. After sample decomposition with hydrofluoric acid and aqua regia, followed by fusion of any insoluble residue with sodium peroxide, the noble metals are separated from the matrix elements by either cation-exchange or co-precipitation with tellurium. The resulting eluate, or the solution obtained after dissolution of the tellurium precipitate, is evaporated to dryness and the noble metals are ultimately determined in a 1M hydrochloric acid medium by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry. The ion-exchange method is recommended for the determination of mug/g levels of gold, silver and platinum-group elements, whilst the tellurium co-precipitation method is recommended for ng/g levels of platinum-group elements. The latter method is not recommended for the determination of ng/g levels of silver and gold in rocks, because of interference from tellurium during atomization in the furnace. Results obtained by these methods for 15 international reference samples, including four Canadian iron-formation rocks, are compared with other published data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".