MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896577439 · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess4076

Income and Wealth Distributions,<scp>D</scp>agum System of

2004· other· en· W1896577439 on OpenAlexaff
Camilo Dagum

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWealth distributionDistribution (mathematics)EconometricsEconomicsType (biology)MathematicsMathematical analysisGeologyInequality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This entry presents the Dagum generating system of income and wealth distributions from which can be derived the Dagum Type I, II, and III as well as other well‐known models, specified in the literature on income distribution. The supports of the Dagum Type I, II, and III models are (0, ∞), [0, ∞), and ( y 0 , ∞), y 0 &gt; 0 respectively. This family of models has been further generalized to fit net wealth distributions with support (−∞, ∞). Eight basic properties are introduced to validate the income and wealth distribution models. The models are illustrated with applications to real‐life data; the fit of each is excellent, meeting the requirements of the eight properties retained as essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Statistical SciencesSame topicIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFrench-language works237,207