MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896682466 · doi:10.1163/156939307794731132

Magnetic Force Calculation between Thin Circular Coils and Thin Filamentary Circular Coil in Air

2007· article· en· W1896682466 on OpenAlexaff
Cevdet Akyel, Slobodan Babić, Slaven Kincic, P.J. Lagacé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoaxialElectromagnetic coilPhysicsSimple (philosophy)Function (biology)AcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents new and fast procedures for calculating magnetic forces between thin circular coaxial coils in air. The results, obtained analytically, are expressed in terms of the complete elliptical integrals of the first and second kind and Heuman's Lambda function. These new expressions described are accurate and simple to apply for several practical applications. Another comparative method based on the filament method is also described here. This paper discusses the computational cost and the accuracy of the magnetic force obtained by two methods. Results obtained by the two approaches examined are in excellent agreement with each other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electromagnetic Waves and ApplicationsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207