MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896795971 · doi:10.1002/rob.21474

Planning using a Network of Reusable Paths: A Physical Embodiment of a Rapidly Exploring Random Tree

2013· article· en· W1896795971 on OpenAlexaff
Braden Stenning, Colin McManus, Timothy D. Barfoot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Robotics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile robotComputer sciencePlannerRobotReal-time computingMotion planningTree (set theory)Global Positioning SystemReuseDistributed computingArtificial intelligencePlan (archaeology)Human–computer interactionSimulationEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing a network of reusable paths is a novel approach to navigation that allows a mobile robot to autonomously seek distant goals in unmapped, GPS‐denied environments, which may make it particularly well‐suited to rovers used for planetary exploration. A network of reusable paths is an extension to visual‐teach‐and‐repeat systems; instead of a simple chain of poses, there is an arbitrary network. This allows the robot to return to any pose it has previously visited, and it lets a robot plan to reuse previous paths. This paradigm results in closer goal acquisition (through reduced localization error) and a more robust approach to exploration with a mobile robot. It also allows a rover to return a sample to an ascent vehicle with a single command. We show that our network‐of‐reusable‐paths approach is a physical embodiment of the popular rapidly exploring random tree (RRT) planner. Simulation results are presented along with the results from two different robotic test systems. These test systems drove over 14 km in planetary analog environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field RoboticsSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207