MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896999881 · doi:10.1002/app.42848

Separation of oil/water emulsions using nano MgO anchored hybrid ultrafiltration membranes for environmental abatement

2015· article· en· W1896999881 on OpenAlexaff
Thanigaivelan Arumugham, Noel Jacob Kaleekkal, Dipak Rana, Mohan Doraiswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneUltrafiltration (renal)Phase inversionMaterials scienceChemical engineeringContact angleEmulsionScanning electron microscopeNano-Membrane technologyBiofoulingSurface energyPolymer chemistryChromatographyChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This work focuses on utilizing the dual role of sulfonated polyphenyl sulfone (SPPSU) as both an anchoring agent and an interlayer modifying agent in the preparation of nano MgO/SPPSU/PPSU membranes for oil removal from water. These asymmetric membranes were prepared using the phase inversion technique. The dispersed nano MgO was observed in the membrane matrix as seen by scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X‐ray analysis. The reduction in contact angle value establishes the increases in hydrophilicity. An increase in SPPSU (wt %) loosens the nano MgO/SPPSU/PPSU membrane packing as exhibited by the increase of d ‐spacing by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The antifouling properties were tested using humic acid, as a model foulant. Further, in castor oil/water emulsion separation, it was found that the membrane with 25 wt % anchored moiety SPPSU/nano MgO produced a greater flux recovery ratio of 94.9% (±0.3) without compromising the oil rejection of 99% (±0.4) and better oleophobic surfaces for oil. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 132 , 42848.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207