MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1897228633 · doi:10.1139/v11-117

Reaction of iodine with metal oxides

2011· article· en· W1897228633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marek Gliński, Urszula Ulkowska

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIodineAnhydrousOxideInorganic chemistryMetalCyclohexaneMetal ions in aqueous solutionIonAdsorptionMoleculePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of iodine with various metal oxides has been studied in both vapour phase (373–873 K) and in solution in cyclohexane, under anhydrous conditions. The course of the reaction has been revised in accordance with literature and experimental data. Apart from adsorbed iodine molecules ([I 2 ] < 200 μmol·g –1 ), the presence of I – ions ([I – ] < 50 μmol·g –1 ) has been noted. IO n – ions have been observed only when both water and strong basic sites, such as those on MgO or La 2 O 3 , are present. It has been found that the strength of interaction of iodine with metal oxide increases with basicity of the oxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207