MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1897297149

An Analysis on Technology Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment in Chongqing

2015· article· en· W1897297149 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hong Yi, Zhizhang Wang, Wei Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentSpillover effectAccessionChinaGlobalizationForeign capitalResearch ObjectOrder (exchange)BusinessAffectionCapital (architecture)International economicsInternational tradeEconomic systemEconomicsMarket economyPolitical scienceMacroeconomicsBusiness administrationEuropean union
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With China’s accession to the WTO, the Chinese economy has involved in the process of globalization quickly. On the one hand, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has played an important role in Chinese economy, on the other hand, and foreign advanced technology comes along with the foreign capital. In order to explore whether FDI technology spillover has affection in Chongqing, this paper selects the 1999-2013 data of large and medium-sized industrial enterprises in Chongqing as the research object, and builds an estimating equations by introducing FDI as physical capital to have an empirical analysis of how FDI technology spillovers affect the technology innovation abilities of Chongqing enterprises. The conclusion shows that FDI has a significant effect in technological spillover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207