Le « vide spirituel paradoxal » en salle de naissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore ce que nous entendons par « vide spirituel paradoxal » en salle de naissance québécoise : s’il semble évident que la naissance est une expérience humaine intense qui a été longtemps entourée par une dimension spirituelle, cette dernière demeure largement inexplorée en contexte contemporain. Nous préciserons d’abord notre hypothèse de travail : 1) en définissant son aspect paradoxal émergeant du contexte médical actuel ; 2) en cherchant à mieux saisir le terme spirituel pour qu’il reflète la présente originalité du contexte religieux et spirituel ; et 3) en illustrant le vide par le silence de la littérature à ce propos. Nous toucherons ensuite à l’aspect terrain des recherches entreprises par le groupe interdisciplinaire SPIritualité et Naissance (groupe SPIN) sur la spiritualité des parents lors de la naissance de leur enfant, ayant mené à ce jour à : 1) une rencontre multidisciplinaire d’experts (médecine, théologie, parents) analysée avec deux grilles (Galek et al., 2005 ; Hall, 2001) ; et 2) une première catégorisation des types d’expériences spirituelles pouvant être vécues par les parents lors de la naissance. Nous conclurons par un cahier de charges qui devraient réduire les résistances rencontrées par le milieu médical au sujet du projet SPIN et sur les suites du projet. This article explores what we have called the “paradoxical spiritual void” in the delivery rooms of Quebec. If it seems evident that birth is an intense human experience that has had a spiritual dimension for a very long time, this dimension remains largely unexplored in the contemporary context. First, we set out our working hypothesis: 1) by defining its paradoxical aspect emerging from the actual medical context; 2) by trying to get a better grasp of the term spiritual so as to make it reflect the originality of the actual religious and spiritual context; and 3) by illustrating the void by way of the silence of literature on the topic. Then, we enlarge on the practical aspects of the research conducted by the multidisciplinary group SPIrituality and Birth (in French: SPIN) on the spirituality of parents during the birth of their child, which has so far led to: 1) a multidisciplinary meeting of experts (medical, theological, parental) using two analytical frameworks (Galek et al., 2005; Hall, 2001); and 2) a first categorization of types of spiritual experience that can be lived by parents during birth. We conclude by specifying measures that should reduce the resistance met by the medical world concerning the SPIN project and its future developments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".