Minorías lingüísticas en Colombia. Acercamiento desde las políticas públicas y los derechos humanos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente artículo se expone una aproximación a la situación de las minorías lingüísticas colombianas, desde una perspectiva de Políticas Públicas y Derechos Humanos. Para lograr este acercamiento, el artículo se estructura de la siguiente manera: se caracterizan los derechoslingüísticos y se registran los convenios internacionales que Colombia ha firmado en torno de este tema; se presentan las características más importantes de una perspectiva de políticas públicas basada en derechos humanos y se analiza, desde el enfoque mencionado, un documento depolítica pública que busca regular la situación de las lenguas minoritarias de Colombia, la Ley 1381 de 2010. Posterior a este análisis, se examina si los derechos lingüísticos están o no garantizados para las comunidades aquí estudiadas. Finalmente, se establece la necesidad deseguir el principio basado en los derechos humanos como perspectiva para mejorar la situación de las comunidades lingüísticamente minoritarias.Palabras clave: derechos humanos, políticas públicas, políticas lingüísticas, minorías lingüísticas, educación bilingüe. AbstractThis article analyzes the condition of Colombian linguistic minorities, from the point of view of public policies and human rights. In doing so, this paper is structured as follows: linguistic rights are described and topic-related international agreements signed by Colombia are registered; the most important characteristics of human rights based public policies are presented, and a public policy document, seeking to regulate the state of Colombian minority languages (namely Law 1381 from 2010), is analyzed through the mentioned approach. Following this analysis, it is examined whether the communities’ linguistic rights are guaranteed. Finally, the necessity of following the principles of human rights as an approach to improve the condition of minority linguistic communities is established.Key words: human rights, public policies, linguistic policies, linguistic minorities, bilingual education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".