MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1898042651 · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/l13

ANTLIA B: A FAINT DWARF GALAXY MEMBER OF THE NGC 3109 ASSOCIATION

2015· article· en· W1898042651 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Centre for Supercomputing ApplicationsEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesUniversity of SussexCenter for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State UniversityScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity College LondonDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of PortsmouthAspen Center for PhysicsIntegrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of PennsylvaniaFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoOhio State UniversityUniversity of California, Santa CruzU.S. Department of EnergyFermilabNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDwarf galaxyGalaxyLocal GroupDwarf galaxy problemAssociation (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the discovery of Antlia B, a faint dwarf galaxy at a projected distance of 72 kpc from NGC 3109

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207