MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1898410970 · doi:10.1080/15257770.2015.1075551

Synthesis of Cyclobutane Nucleosides 2-Preparation of Thymine and Uracil Analogues

2015· article· en· W1898410970 on OpenAlex
Hanan Afifi, Abdelaziz Ebead, Joseph Pignatelli, Edward Lee‐Ruff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThymineUracilChemistrySodium methoxideAlkylationNucleosideBorohydrideStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisDNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1-(2-Oxocyclobutyl-4-benzoyloxymethyl)-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione and 1-(2-oxocyclobutyl-4-benzoyloxymethyl)-5-methyl-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione can be prepared by reaction of uracil and thymine, respectively, with 3-benzoyloxymethyl-2-bromocyclobutanone. The N-alkylation gave both cis and trans isomers with the trans isomer predominating for uracil whereas the trans isomer was the only product which could be isolated for thymine. Both series were subjected to borohydride reduction followed by transesterification with methoxide giving the corresponding uracil and thymine nucleoside analogues. The uracil derivative 1-(2-oxocyclobutyl-4-benzoyloxymethyl)-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione was irradiated in aqueous acetonitrile to generate isonucleoside analogues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it