MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W189849435

Academic Program Life Cycle: A Redefined Approach to Understanding Market Demands.

2004· article· en· W189849435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siran Mukerji, Purnendu Tripathi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of e-learning & distance education · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcurrenceCompetition (biology)Distance educationPolitical scienceMarket competitionHumanitiesSociologyManagementPedagogyPhilosophyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education can develop intellectual capability in people, which may in turn lead toward development of a more humane society. Open and distance learning (ODL) has provided one means of achieving social objectives democratically. In India significant success has been achieved through a network of 10 open universities and 104 institutes of open and distance education (IODE). Challenge and competition in the education sector have presented a new situation where institutions are now viewed as conglomerates and educational programs as educational products. Established ODL institutions need to compete. The students are perceived as end users or customers in the emerging education market. Institutions require innovative marketing strategies in this highly competitive market for services, and these strategies depend on the stage of maturation of the educational programs in an academic program life cycle (APLC). L’éducation peut développer des capacités intellectuelles chez les individus, qui peuvent, à leur tour, contribuer au développement d’une société plus humaine. L’enseignement à distance a constitué un moyen d’atteindre des objectifs sociaux de façon démocratique. En Inde, des succès importants ont été obtenus par le biais d’un réseau de dix universités à distance et de 104 instituts d’enseignement à distance. Le défi et la compétition dans le secteur de l’éducation engendrent une nouvelle situation dans laquelle les établissements sont maintenant vus comme des conglomérats, et les programmes d’enseignement comme des produits d’enseignement. Les établissements de formation à distance établis doivent affronter la concurrence. Dans ce marché de l’éducation en émergence, les étudiants sont perçus comme des utilisateurs ou des clients. Les établissements doivent avoir recours à des stratégies de marketing innovatrices pour conquérir ce marché de services hautement compétitif. Ces stratégies dépendent du niveau de maturation des programmes d’enseignement dans le cycle de vie des programmes pédagogiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0140.017
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of e-learning & distance educationSame topicGlobal Education Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207