MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early emergence of an H275Y mutation in a hematopoietic cell transplant recipient treated with intravenous peramivir

2010· article· en· W1898532163 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Renaud, Steven A. Pergam, Christina S. Polyak, Reema Jain, Jane Kuypers, Janet A. Englund, Lawrence Corey, Michael Boeckh

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplant Infectious Disease · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsVirologyMedicineOseltamivirResistance mutationPopulationNeuraminidaseMutationDrug resistanceReverse transcriptaseVirusPolymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyBiologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C. Renaud, S.A. Pergam, C. Polyak, R. Jain, J. Kuypers, J.A. Englund, L. Corey, M.J. Boeckh. Early emergence of an H275Y mutation in a hematopoietic cell transplant recipient treated with intravenous peramivir.Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 513–517. All rights reserved Abstract: Oseltamivir resistance in pandemic 2009 influenza A/H1N1 is caused by the neuraminidase mutation H275Y. This mutation has also been associated with in vitro resistance to peramivir, but few clinical cases have been described to date. Using allele-specific real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay for the H275Y mutation, we were able to identify resistant H1N1 in a hematopoietic cell transplant recipient receiving intravenous peramivir therapy, and through serial testing we determined the molecular evolution of resistance. This case demonstrates that an H275Y mutant population can emerge early and replicate in vivo under peramivir antiviral pressure to become the major viral population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplant Infectious DiseaseSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207