L’anthropologie brésilienne face aux politiques d’action affirmative1 (note de recherche)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la première moitié du XXe siècle, les anthropologues, nommément Gilberto Freyre, ont forgé des outils interprétatifs cohérents du Brésil. Depuis les années 1970, les revendications concernant les identités culturelles, l’histoire et aussi la politique ont changé les rapports sociaux. Et face à la demande croissante d’inclusion, provenant de groupes subalternes comme les afro-descendants et les indigènes, le modèle interprétatif dominant, basé sur la fusion des trois races et l’homogénéité culturelle, a perdu une grande part de validité. En porte à faux par rapport à la notion de justice sociale et contraire aux politiques d’action affirmative, le courant dominant de l’anthropologie brésilienne témoigne une pensée conservatrice qui réclame un effort pour remodeler sa vision théorique relative à la dynamique identitaire et aux relations raciales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".