La terminologie de référence au service de la langue française au Québec et son usage dans le domaine de l’informatique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite du degré d’intégration de la terminologie informatique officialisée dans les communications institutionnalisées. Son objectif est d’évaluer l’impact de la production et de la diffusion des recommandations linguistiques par l’Office québécois de la langue française. Pour cela, j’ai adopté le protocole terminométrique élaboré par Jean Quirion (2000) et mesuré, à partir d’un corpus constitué de sites Web d’entreprises informatiques, le degré d’implantation des termes officialisés du sous-domaine des périphériques informatiques ainsi que celui de leurs concurrents français et anglais. L’étude révèle que les termes officialisés sont largement implantés dans le corpus et atteste de l’importance des enquêtes mesurant l’implantation terminologique dans un contexte d’aménagement linguistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".