Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portant sur la formation à l’École nationale d’administration entre 1945 et 1982, cet article entend contribuer à l’analyse des ressorts cognitifs de la domination bureaucratique. Au moyen d’une étude archivistique, il montre que les enseignements sont travaillés par des processus de changement indexés sur des rapports de force situés au croisement du champ du pouvoir et du champ des grandes écoles. Ces inflexions permettent d’historiciser la figure du « généraliste », souvent mobilisée pour caractériser les hauts fonctionnaires français. Du haut fonctionnaire humaniste dans les années 1950 au modèle « opérationnel » des années 1970, en passant par le projet de haut fonctionnaire scientifique dans les années 1960, ces constructions curriculaires de l’excellence administrative participent à la recomposition des modes de légitimation des groupes bureaucratiques, ainsi qu’aux transformations des catégories symboliques qui encadrent les dispositifs d’action publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".