MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1898940823 · doi:10.29173/mruer158

Footprints on the web

2014· article· en· W1898940823 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joy Barnett

Bibliographic record

VenueMount Royal Undergraduate Education Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPedagogyMathematics educationCitizenship educationService (business)SociologyField (mathematics)PsychologyPolitical scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the topic of digital citizenship and how it relates to current students, pre-service teachers, and teachers in the field. It asks the questions; what is digital citizenship? How important is it to teach in elementary? Junior high? High school? What kinds of resources should I, as a pre-service teacher be aware of in my journey to becoming an elementary teacher? I created surveys to address issues and answer some of these research questions. Not only did I send out surveys, I also conducted two interviews to ask extended questions that were raised as I gathered my research. Results showed that current students may or may not realize the importance of digital citizenship, but pre-service and elementary teachers believe it is crucial that this topic be covered in the classroom. This research project is profound for teachers that are developing a teaching philosophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMount Royal Undergraduate Education ReviewSame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207