Optimal Resource Allocation in Multicast Device-to-Device Communications Underlaying LTE Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a framework for resource allocations for multicast device-to-device (D2D) communications underlaying the uplink of a Long-Term Evolution (LTE) network. The objective is to maximize the sum throughput of active cellular users (CUs) and feasible D2D multicast groups in a cell, while meeting a certain signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraint for both the CUs and the D2D groups. We formulate the general problem of power and channel allocation as a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, where one D2D group can reuse the channels of multiple CUs and where the channel of each CU can be reused by multiple D2D groups. Distinct from existing approaches in the literature, our formulation and solution methods provide an effective and flexible means to utilize radio resources in cellular networks and share them with multicast groups without causing harmful interference to each other. The MINLP problem is transformed so that it can be solved optimally by a variant of the generalized Bender decomposition method with provable convergence. A greedy algorithm and a low-complexity heuristic solution are then devised. The performance of all schemes is evaluated through extensive simulations. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed greedy algorithm can achieve close-to-optimal performance and that the heuristic algorithm provides good performance, even though it is inferior than that of the greedy, with much lower complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it