Semi-Blind Channel Estimation with Superimposed Training for OFDM-Based AF Two-Way Relaying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of channel estimation for OFDM-based amplify-and-forward (AF) two-way relay networks (TWRNs). While previous works have adopted a pilot-based approach, we propose a semi-blind approach that exploits both the transmitted pilots as well as the received data samples to improve the estimation performance. Our proposed semi-blind estimator is based on the Gaussian maximum likelihood (GML) criterion which treats that data symbols as Gaussian-distributed nuisance parameters. The GML estimates are obtained using an iterative quasi-Newton method. To assist in the estimation of the individual channels, we adopt a superimposed training strategy at the relay. We design the pilot vectors of the terminals and the relay to optimize the estimation performance. Furthermore, we derive the semi-blind and pilot-based Cramer-Rao bounds (CRBs) to use as performance benchmarks. Finally, we use simulation studies to show that the proposed method provides substantial improvements in estimation accuracy over the conventional pilot-based estimation and that it approaches the semi-blind CRB as SNR increases. These improvements are possible using only a limited number of OFDM data blocks, which demonstrates the practicality of the semi-blind approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".