MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1899643429 · doi:10.1002/ieam.1706

Integrated assessment of climate change impact on surface runoff contamination by pesticides

2015· article· en· W1899643429 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Patrick Gagnon, Claudia Sheedy, Alain N. Rousseau, Gaétan Bourgeois, Gérald Chouinard

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en AgroenvironnementAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaQuébec Ministère du Développement Durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte Contre les Changements ClimatiquesMinistère de l'Agriculture et de l'AlimentationInstitut national de la recherche scientifiqueMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
KeywordsCodling mothEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffOrchardPesticideClimate changePhenologyPEST analysisCropMalusAgricultureAgronomyHydrology (agriculture)EcologyBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pesticide transport by surface runoff depends on climate, agricultural practices, topography, soil characteristics, crop type, and pest phenology. To accurately assess the impact of climate change, these factors must be accounted for in a single framework by integrating their interaction and uncertainty. This article presents the development and application of a framework to assess the impact of climate change on pesticide transport by surface runoff in southern Québec (Canada) for the 1981–2040 period. The crop enemies investigated were: weeds for corn (Zea mays); and for apple orchard (Malus pumila), 3 insect pests (codling moth [Cydia pomonella], plum curculio [Conotrachelus nenuphar], and apple maggot [Rhagoletis pomonella]), 2 diseases (apple scab [Venturia inaequalis], and fire blight [Erwinia amylovora]). A total of 23 climate simulations, 19 sites, and 11 active ingredients were considered. The relationship between climate and phenology was accounted for by bioclimatic models of the Computer Centre for Agricultural Pest Forecasting (CIPRA) software. Exported loads of pesticides were evaluated at the edge-of-field scale using the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM), simulating both hydrology and chemical transport. A stochastic model was developed to account for PRZM parameter uncertainty. Results of this study indicate that for the 2011–2040 period, application dates would be advanced from 3 to 7 days on average with respect to the 1981–2010 period. However, the impact of climate change on maximum daily rainfall during the application window is not statistically significant, mainly due to the high variability of extreme rainfall events. Hence, for the studied sites and crop enemies considered, climate change impact on pesticide transported in surface runoff is not statistically significant throughout the 2011-2040 period. Integr Environ Assess Managem 2016;12:559–571. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2015; Published 2015 SETAC Key Points Integration of climate model data, bioclimatic model data, agricultural management scenarios, a pesticide transport model, and a stochastic model in a single framework to assess the climate change impact on exported pesticide loads in surface runoff. Assessment of climate change impacts on both pesticide applications and losses by surface runoff. Assessment of climate change impacts of major crop enemies in Québec (Canada) in a relatively near horizon (1981–2040). For the studied sites and crop enemies considered, climate change impact on pesticide transported in surface runoff is not statistically significant, mainly due to the high variability of intense rainfall events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207