MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1899813288 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1329462

A placement algorithm for implementation of analog LSI/VLSI systems

2004· article· en· W1899813288 on OpenAlexafffund
Lihong Zhang, R. Raut, Yingtao Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSimulated annealingNondeterministic algorithmComputer scienceVery-large-scale integrationAlgorithmAnalogue electronicsPlacementAdderFloorplanElectronic circuitMathematical optimizationPhysical designCircuit designMathematicsEngineeringEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analog macro-cell placement by nature is an NP-complete (nondeterministic polynomial-time) problem. In this paper, we present an approach following the optimization flow of normal genetic algorithm (GA) controlled by the methodology of simulated annealing. The bit-matrix representation is employed to improve the search efficiency. Moreover, a cell-slide based flat placement style satisfying the symmetry constraints is developed to drastically reduce the configuration space without degrading search opportunities. Furthermore, the dedicated cost function covers the special requirements of analog integrated circuits, including area, net length, aspect ratio, proximity, parasitic effect, etc. the algorithm parameters are studied using fractional factorial experiments and a meta-GA approach. The proposed algorithm has been tested using several analog circuits, and appears superior to the simulated-annealing approaches mostly used for analog macro-cell placement nowadays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207