MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1899904953 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7158275

Cognitive spectrum access in device-to-device-enabled cellular networks

2015· article· en· W1899904953 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Hamdi Sakr, Hina Tabassum, Ekram Hossain, Dong In Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCellular networkCognitive radioComputer networkInterference (communication)Spectral efficiencyResource allocationRadio resource managementChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications linkChannel allocation schemesTransmitterCellular communicationResource management (computing)TelecommunicationsWirelessBase stationWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive spectrum access (CSA) in in-band D2D-enabled cellular networks is a potential feature that can promote efficient resource utilization and interference management among coexisting cellular and D2D users. In this article, we first outline the challenges in resource allocation posed by the coexistence of cellular and D2D users. Next, we provide a qualitative overview of the existing resource allocation and interference management policies for in-band D2D-enabled cellular networks. We then demonstrate how cognition along with limited information exchange between D2D users and the core network can be used to mitigate interference and enhance spectral efficiency of both cellular and D2D users. In particular, we propose a CSA scheme that exploits channel sensing and interference- aware decision making at the D2D terminals. This CSA scheme at the D2D terminals is complemented by a D2D-aware channel access method at the cellular BSs. The performance gains of the proposed CSA scheme are characterized in terms of channel access probability for a typical D2D transmitter and spectral efficiencies for both cellular and D2D transmissions. Finally, potential research issues that require further investigation are highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207