MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1899907138 · doi:10.4000/edc.391

Sports et publicités imprimées dans les magazines en France : une communication masculine dominante et stéréotypée ?

2006· article· fr· W1899907138 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Héas, Dominique Bodin, Luc Robène, Dominique Meunier, Jens Blumrodt

Bibliographic record

VenueEtudes de communication/Études de communication · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSubordination (linguistics)ArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En France, les publicités à thématique sportive, insérées dans les magazines, semblent mobiliser des éléments stéréotypés. Les hommes sont largement sur représentés lorsque les femmes sont moins présentes et mises en scène dans une logique de subordination désormais classiquement démontrée en sociologie, comme d’en d’autres disciplines. Couleur, activités des personnages, etc. renforcent ces représentations traditionnelles. A quand un marketing « genré » novateur ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEtudes de communication/Études de communicationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207