MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1900134344 · doi:10.5555/1838206.1838478

Symbolic model checking for agent interactions

2010· article· en· W1900134344 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed El-Menshawy, Wei Wan, Jamal Bentahar, Rachida Dssouli

Bibliographic record

VenueAdaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel checkingComputer scienceSymbolic trajectory evaluationSemantics (computer science)Computation tree logicProtocol (science)Programming languageTheoretical computer scienceFormal verificationTemporal logicModalitiesCryptographic protocolSymbolic executionComputer securitySoftwareCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the issue of the specification and verification of commitment protocols having a social semantics. We begin with developing a new language to formally specify these protocols and desirable properties by enhancing CTL* logic with modalities of commitments and actions on these commitments. We also present a symbolic model checking algorithm for commitments and their actions based on OBDDs. Finally, we present an implementation and experimental results of the proposed protocol using the NuSMV and MCMAS symbolic model checkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdaptive Agents and Multi-Agents SystemsSame topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207